![]() In a statement accompanying his departments antitrust complaint, he charges that in essence, what Microsoft has been doing, through a wide variety of illegal business practices, is leveraging its Windows operating system monopoly to force its other software products on consumers (Klein 1998b, 1).īoth Kleins and Renos allegations appear to reflect a widespread public sentiment. Assistant Attorney General Joel Klein echoes Renos claims. We took action today , Reno announced earlier this year, to ensure that consumers will have the ability to choose among competing software products ( PC Magazine 1997). Attorney General Janet Reno had previously staked out: Microsoft is unlawfully taking advantage of its Windows monopoly to protect and extend that monopoly. Hence, it seems beyond dispute that the Justice Departments antitrust assault on Microsoft will, if successful, produce benefits for the American public. The Justice Departments lawsuit merely reaffirms the position U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia on May 18, 1998, the Justice Department declares unequivocally that Microsoft possesses (and for several years has possessed) monopoly power in the market for personal computer operating systems. In the complaint filed against Microsoft in the U.S. The Microsoft monopoly is self-evident, if the Justice Departments lawyers are to be believed. Single Issues of The Independent Review.Podcast: Independent Outlook / Conversations.International Economics and Development. ![]() Monopoly - the World's Dumbest Board Game".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |